Monday, February 28, 2022

Debate essay outline

Debate essay outline



On July 24th,debate essay outline, the respective leaders of the world's dominant capitalist and communist economic powers met at the opening of the American National Exhibition -- which was held at Sokolniki Park at the U. Prepare rebuttals to address potential counterarguments. he transition of… The ancestry, family background, siblings, educational life, death and burial of Mary Todd Lincoln were presented in this paper. These two pictures of dire futures brought debate essay outline by the healthcare bill seem to be mutually exclusive, with one predicting uncontrolled expenses and the other control so tight that care is debate essay outline denied for expense reasons alone, but both were a part of the argument against the national healthcare bill. Data is numerical. It helps you logically present your ideas and saves you from getting stuck with writer's block.





How to write a business article



Negative Argument for Debate Negative Argument Government should NOT turn away from fossil fuels Installing solar collectors on rooftops and insulating homes in America will not provide citizens and businesses with the energy needed to keep American strong. It is paramount that the U. continues to use fossil fuels. It's a no-brainer, friends: if we shut down fossil fuel electrical generating plants, we shut down American industry; we also shut down computers, schools, hospitals, factories. org"cleaner fossil fuel systems mitigate and even neutralize the adverse consequences of the use of fossil fuels References Bray, Tom, debate essay outline. Fossil Fuel Tempest. Byfield, Mike.


Kyoto -- the science and the hype. Cold War A Critical Debate of Cold War in 'Origins of Modern World' y definition, the term Cold War implies a state of no war and no peace between two opponents. It is the kind of international rivalry in which states use all types of measures including political, economic, debate essay outline, social, diplomatic, technical, military and paramilitary to achieve national objectives, however, it avoids overt armed conflict. It is a jargon, which is generally used to denote tense relations between former USSR and U. during the debate essay outline President Roosevelt conceived it during when Second World War was still in progress, which reflects deep rooted animosity between U, debate essay outline.


And USSR. The two countries fought debate essay outline together as allies against a common enemy, debate essay outline, Nazi Germany, but the hostility against each other never died down. It re emerged as soon as the end of War debate essay outline in sight. In order to understand the…. Bibliography Clare, J. Consequences of the Cold War. Ererdi, C. The Cold War Era. Global Security. Cold War. Retrieved from GlobalSecurity. htm Harbutt, F, debate essay outline. his however is not possible under the form of governance and control seen in New Zealand. he other example is that of heavy regulation as found in the U. And the UK. his sort of regulation results in increased controls and governance because heavy regulation doesn't lead to reduced controls and this would again lead to heavy investment in controls.


his heavy investment is undesirable since it becomes Pareto inefficient. he general affect of regulation is to restrict the variation in demand for controls while simultaneously raising investment level in an otherwise unregulated environment like New Zealand. he problem with this study is that it has some limitations which may have been affecting the results. For one we did not have full access to publicly available information and thus we may not have assessed controls effectively. his is particularly true in the case of internal debate essay outline activities since we did…. This relationship was seen in New Zealand in however it may debate essay outline be always be correct to increase controls and investment in controls if we want it to be Pareto efficiency.


This debate essay outline says that allocation from one set of goods to another should only be made when this transfer would make the other set richer but the first set not debate essay outline worse off. This however is not possible under the form of governance and control seen in New Zealand. The other example is that of heavy regulation as found in the U. This sort of regulation results in increased controls and governance because heavy regulation doesn't lead to reduced controls and debate essay outline would again lead to heavy investment in controls.


This heavy debate essay outline is undesirable since it becomes Pareto inefficient. The general affect of regulation is to restrict the variation in demand for controls while simultaneously raising investment level in an otherwise unregulated environment like New Zealand. The problem with this study is that it has some limitations which may have been affecting the results. This is particularly true in the case of internal auditing activities since we did not have access to full information on those. Further research would be needed to correct these possible errors and fill the gaps, debate essay outline. Secondly we were also limited by the lack of knowledge about the quality of internal controls being used.


Since the quality was unknown, this may have affected the relevance of our results to the overall issue. Despite these limitations, we have managed to discover a complex link between risks and controls and this finding merits further research. It would be interesting to discover how this relationship works in a heavily regulated environment especially under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Propositions Any reasonable topic for debate involves controversy; otherwise the issue would fail to be debatable. The phrase "Inadequate parking facilities on campus" is not even a full sentence. If the statement read, "There are inadequate parking facilities on campus,' some clarification would still be helpful in order for it to be an effective statement of debate. For example, the statement could read, "There are inadequate parking facilities on campus and therefore we should build a new parking lot in the park, debate essay outline.


Statement "b," "the AIDS crisis," means literally nothing; there is nothing debatable about that statement. If someone had mentioned, "the Debate essay outline crisis is a problem shared equally by governments as by citizens," or if someone said "the…. Fire: A Debate Over its Origins The ability to control fire was clearly a turning point in human history, although the conditions which enabled humans to master the ability to control fire remains controversial amongst anthropologists. The fact that it was understood that fire was a significant milestone is evident even in myth, as the god Prometheus is depicted as offering fire to the first humans, and thus giving humans godlike power.


Fire is a source of warmth, enabling human beings to better survive harsh conditions in the cold, and also a source of light, extending the productive day of humans. The beginnings of the human use of fire are often called so-called cooking hypothesis. As anyone who has ever cooked is aware, it is considerably easier to digest food which has been broken down through the process of fire. When humans were able to regularly cook their food, they…. Reference Berna, F. The taming of fire was a turning point in prehistory: When and where did it begin?


debate essay outline Dialogue webcast. Boston University. Oh, for a muse of fire: An archaeological perspective on anthropogenic fire. Contraceptives and the Health Covers Debate The debate over who should cover the cost of contraception is alive in our society today and equally contradictory among different groups, debate essay outline, depending on the religious persuasion, philosophical inclination or social upbringing of the people involved. There are, debate essay outline, however, factors that remain true and alive with us that need to be well understood first before delving further into the ideological inclinations, the teen pregnancy in the U.


stands atas of with these babies being born of debate essay outline between 15 to 19 years of age. This accounts for Department of Health and Human Services, References Andrews M. Most Employers See A Benefit In Covering Contraceptives. About Teen Pregnancy, debate essay outline. htm Park M. Birth Control Should Be Fully Covered Under Health Plans, Report Says. S Department of Health and Human Services, Trends in Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing. Capital Punishment Debate The United States is one of the few industrialized nations in the world that still practices capital punishment.


Most European nations and our northern neighbor Canada do not have the death penalty and in fact will not send wanted criminals to the United States because of their opposition to capital punishment. Proponents of the death penalty say that debate essay outline can be a deterrent to crime, that it can be cheaper than life without parole sentences, that it is a viable and just response to murder, that the death penalty is a moral imperative or even a display of divine justice. However, statistics and facts prove otherwise, debate essay outline, which is why I am firmly opposed to capital punishment. I base my argument on four major points. First, debate essay outline, studies show that the death penalty is costly, more costly than incarceration. Second, the death penalty is irreversible.


Many people are wrongfully…. Works Cited 'A Question of Innocence. Robinson, Bruce. Education Creativity has developed to become an important part of education as evident in the increased inclusion of creativity into education policy. Debate essay outline light of these recent trends, creativity has become one of the most important core values and skills in the modern education curriculum. This has debate essay outline to the emergence of the concept of creative thinking as an important component in today's education systems and policies. The significance of creativity in today's education policies and systems is evident in the increase in discussions about the concept and its consideration as a key driver of education curriculum.


The inclusion of creativity in education is fueled by the fact education is focused on being a process that encourages exploration and opening up rather than simply relying on limitations and restricted choices Ofield-Kerr par, 3. Therefore, education provides an opportunity for students to experiment in order to identify their actual interests and…. Works Cited Ofield-Kerr, Simon. Guardian News and Media Limited, 17 June PETERS, DIANE. B-schools Join the Debate. The Globe and Mail Inc.





essays on climate change



Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. New York, NY: Cengage Learning. Challenges Faced in Preparing for the Debate Four challenges I faced in preparing for the debate were: 1 understanding the logic of my own argument—i. The first challenge for me—understanding my own argument, its premise and its logic—was difficult because it required a deep understanding of the subject and all the various sides and aspects of it. A superficial grasp of the subject would not do. I had to understand it fully in order to argue it, and I had to ensure that my argument was based on a valid premise. This was the first challenge, and I knew that my argument depended on doing the research, so I….


Works Cited Chaffee, John. Thinking Critically. Boston: Wadsworth, Goldhill, D. Debating Structured vs. Unstructured Methods This week, you have learned about the characteristics of structured and unstructured approaches in qualitative research. For this assignment, you will compare the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and discuss the merits of each. To prepare for this assignment: Consider what you have learned in your research courses about planning out the methodology for a research design. As you may recall, a structured or predetermined approach has been advocated in most, if not all, of your research textbooks up to this point.


eview Chapter 5 in Qualitative esearch Design: An Interactive Approach. In this chapter, Maxwell mentions the differences between a structured and an unstructured approach to qualitative methods. To what extent do you agree with the point-of-view that an unstructured approach to qualitative methods can be desirable? Under what circumstances might this be true? With these thoughts in mind: Write a response of…. References Maxwell, J. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach 2nd Ed. Technology, a very familiar phenomenon of modern world, is continuously enhancing its ways towards comforts and luxuries. New thoughts and ideas are coming with every passing second, and what started as only a blurred vision, now became a necessity for all mankind.


These have become a need of today's society making the society very much involved in these technological reforms. Several debates have been made on the topic that although the level of our technology keeps on improving day by day, but do all of these hi-tech gadgets give us the proper advantages? Are we really aware of the two different sides of the same mirror, or are we just so much accustomed to all such things around us that we don't bother to look upon the other side? Amongst these debates, two of the very famous are classical McDermott vs.


Mesthene debate of s and contemporary debate of Joy…. Works Cited Bill Joy: Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics. html Brown, John S. And Duguid, Paul. Chapter 4. A Response to Bill Joy and the Doom-and- Gloom Technofuturists. pdf Emannuel G. Mesthene vs. John McDermott. ppt James Burke Connections 1 - The Trigger Effect. Providence Debate According to J. De Caussade, God speaks "today as he spoke in former times to our fathers when there were no directors as at present, nor any regular method of direction. De Caussade asserts that God maintains and has always maintained a personal relationship, or a providential relationship, with mankind.


However, the exact way in which God exercises control over the world and the lives of humans in the world has been debated for many centuries. Indeed, in the realm of God's providence, there are numerous variables and nuanced positions, which have been argued by Christians since the time of the Apostles through to the Protestant Reformation right up to today. This paper will consider the two broader views of recent centuries -- the Arminian and the Calvinist -- and evaluate whether there might be alternative views that incorporate both perspectives of how Providence…. Bibliography Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, Benziger Bros, ed. Fathers of the English Dominican Province]. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Chang, Andrew D.


health care debate that has been going in the United States. It discusses the Obama Care Act and how it impacts the society. Functionalist perspectives and theories are utilized in analyzing the situation and what outcomes are expected. The major themes and concepts of the functionalist theory are discussed in detail. The Health Care reform proposed by the Obama Administration has long been the area of debate in America and in countries all over the world. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act go on to cut down the number of people who are not insured. It requires small businesses to provide medical insurance to all the people working in the business. The employers are obliged to provide a good quality medical insurance.


Failure of the small business to provide a good health care system will result in a penalty for any employee that goes uninsured. This act applies to…. References Berkman, L. et al. Gerhardt, U. The Sociological Review, 27 2 , p. Napsha, J. The Washington Times, 29th June. In my work "Conduit" I presented a basic fantasy of everyone's, to pee off a skyscraper. While this is a crazy and often considered offensive idea, sometimes it is those notions that free the mind in a new way. Stelarc: I hope that people are offended by my art. I hope that in a way people are offended at the way that science has made the human body obsolete. I want viewers to feel and think when they see me hanging from flesh hooks or be enraged when they see my "Third Ear" for perhapes it will reawaken and reanimate what seems to be a dead society.


Question 3: Where do you see art and society moving in the future? Stelarc: While I can't really speak for art in general, I fear that society is moving further and further away from the miraculous and inspired. It seems to me that…. If Clark's argument held true, then would it not be easier to simply hand the students sheets of paper with the material on it and expect them to simply read them and learn. We all know that this works for some students, but not for others. Some students need to hear the message and respond socially to it in order to learn the material. Classroom learning is not only about learning that 2 X 4 is 8, but being able to take that knowledge out of the context in which it was learned and to be able to apply it in a real world situation.


This is where the multi-media approach to learning comes into play. This supports the role of the media and the emotions surrounding…. References Clark, R. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53 4 , Dewan, S. Distance Education Teacher as a Leader: Learning from the Path Goal Leadership Theory. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Gaigg, S. Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Kozma, R. Will media influencing learning? Reframing the debate. Therefore, while Lincoln gave a rather general statement concerning the matter, Lincoln offered an image common people can relate to and therefore agree upon.


Thus, Lincoln's use of the human rights issue was unsuccessful in this context. Secondly, Douglas raised the issue of the states free to decide on their own whether they accepted slavery or not. Douglas, points out the fact that states have according to the constitution the right and power to decide on their own for the rights given to the black people. Referring to Illinois, he concludes that slaves "belong to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position," thus "I hold that Illinois had a right to abolish and prohibit slavery as she did" and therefore "we must leave each and every other State to decide for itself the same question.


Bibliography First Debate with Stephen a. Ottawa, Illinois. August 21, The National Parc Service web site. htm Jenkins, Philip. A history of the United States. New York: Palgrave, Remembering the U. And USSR Kitchen Debates of Before the bellicosity and belligerence exchanged by the United States of America USA and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics USSR in the s -- an era known today as the "Cold ar" -- the two recently emergent superpowers engaged in the delicate dance of diplomacy in the wake of their shared victory in orld ar II. One of the most interesting examples of the doomed diplomatic efforts between American and Russian leaders was known as the "Kitchen Debates," as U. Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev squared off in an often rancorous debate amidst a truly unique backdrop.


On July 24th, , the respective leaders of the world's dominant capitalist and communist economic powers met at the opening of the American National Exhibition -- which was held at Sokolniki Park at the U. Embassy in Moscow as…. Works Cited Jakabovics, Barrie Robyn. Nixon, Richard M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University. Kitchen Debate - Transcript. Washington D. Douglas did not believe that blacks were equal to whites, but he also didn't necessarily believe that because of that fact they should be slaves. Rather, he believed that it was up to every state to decide what the rights should be. He didn't want to set forth laws about this, but rather, he wanted every state to decide for itself. One of Lincoln's better points was that slavery had not served to bring the states of the Union together, but rather, slavery had served to put a wedge between the states of the Union.


He thought that when people realized that slavery would not and could not be everlasting, it would simply stop. He thought that…. Works Cited Guelzo, Allen C. Lincoln and Douglas: The Debates that Defined America. The Making of a Nation. Baptism Debate: An Examination of the Purpose and Merits of Baptism There is no trick involved in entering the Kingdom of Heaven, but many theologians argue that there are some important steps that must be taken to help pave the way, including being baptized. Issues such as whether complete immersion is required or simply a token sprinkling, who is authorized to perform baptisms and even the fundamental purpose and merits of baptism, have all been the source of enormously divisive controversy within the Christian church for two millennia.


To determine the facts, this paper provides a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature concerning different views about the purpose and merits of baptism, and whether baptism is reserved for believers only or for infants as well. A discussion concerning what mode of baptism is biblical is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion. References Bryant, S. Cavendish, R. New York: Marshall Cavendish Corporation. Governor Romney's public speaking style was somewhat less poised, but was again immediately observable in his first response. After also thanking everyone and even joking wth the President about his anniversary, he launched into a somewhat hesitant series of brief anecdotes about people wanting help.


His posture shifted more frequently, his speech contained more hesitations and pauses, and his gaze wavered from the camera to the moderator to the audience present at the University of Denver, and his words were equally as evasive as the President's but without the confidence or comfort. Again, this appeared to continue throughout the debate, though Romeny did appear to gain some confidence as the debate wore on and his comfort in the setting grew. Others believed that cost control would become a matter for distant and impersonal government boards, with a direct effect on care, and that the reduced competition brought about by the federal government's entrance into the insurance market in any form would simply lead to rising healthcare costs without any real control or oversight.


These two pictures of dire futures brought about by the healthcare bill seem to be mutually exclusive, with one predicting uncontrolled expenses and the other control so tight that care is potentially denied for expense reasons alone, but both were a part of the argument against the national healthcare bill. Oversight There has also been considerable debate regarding exactly who will be overseeing the program. There was considerable talk of "death panels," a deliberately fear-invoking image of a bunch of suit-wearing individuals determining when it was time for a person to die rather than continue to receive…. Another hugely contentious issue in the healthcare debate that raged in the summer of was the control of the expenses of the program, and how that would be related to the care received and the cost of that care and the insurance to begin with to the average taxpayer.


On one side, many politicians and advocates stressed that even a single-payer system wouldn't mean that a government bureaucrat would decide care based on a need to control expenses; the programs overseers would assess the costs of providing healthcare and adjust spending and rates accordingly, just as occurs in the private insurance and medical services industries. There was considerable talk of "death panels," a deliberately fear-invoking image of a bunch of suit-wearing individuals determining when it was time for a person to die rather than continue to receive expensive medical care.


The thought of panels of government bureaucrats overseeing every aspect of care, including end-of-life care, was horrific to many people, and a major source of anger and opposition to the bill. Proponents of the bill, however, insisted that the doctor and patient would still determine health care plans, and that the government's role would purely be in ensuring adequate funding in order to cover the vast majority of currently uninsured Americans. The reconciliation of these two views is still long in coming. Political Debate One on the most hotly contested debates today is whether President Bush should invade Iraq. Though there are numerous experts arguing both side of this debate, most of the public's questions are left unanswered. Terrorist Attacks There are critics who believe the United States involvement in the U.


sanctions provoked the terrorist attacks on September They blame the sanctions for an increase in the death rate of Iraqi children due to starvation. Others, however, blame Saddam Hussein for the deaths, stating he is buying weapons and living a luxurious lifestyle instead of providing food and medical supplies to the Iraqi people Sanctions, An Argument Against ar The terrorist attacks have lead President Bush to consider invading Iraq. Before he can make this decision, he must first address several issues such as how much threat does Iraq pose, the cost of war, relationships with Arab Community and…. DON'T BLAME THEH SANCTIONS. Denver Rocky Mountain News. Frazza, Luke. Agence France Presse.


Xinhua News Agency. He in turn is raising questions and rebuttals from those who oppose his regime's initiatives. Three articles from The New York Times show different perspectives on this challenge -- specifically, its effects on the social, political and economic situation of those it is aimed at rebuffing. Each article shows why Russia's new anti-liberal direction is problematic for both…. Works Cited Bernstein, Jacob. Gladstone, Rick. Taking one's life as a result of the fact that the respective person is expected to suffer inhumane pain for several years until his or her death cannot possibly be compared with murder or suicide. Morality should actually be combined with logics in understanding euthanasia and people need to be more sympathetic and less egocentric regarding individuals who prefer euthanasia as the "safe way out.


A normal pro-life campaign is less complex than Catholic anti-abortion principles because of the religious aspect of the matter. The connection between the Catholic Church and morality has come to be stronger in the recent years in spite of the fact that it does not essentially function based on morality alone. To a certain degree, one might be inclined to consider that the Church is wrong in promoting anti-abortion simply because it wants to follow Christian tradition. Catholic teachings are essentially derived from the Bible and "whatever the "moral" teaching of the Church might be, it is, in the final analysis, a function of how to read the Scripture.


Christian morality is not, in short, a "stand-alone" moral position" O'Brien In promoting anti-abortion messages, Catholic representatives practically go against the general message that the Gospel is trying to convey. Catholics have recently been more determined than ever to fight…. Works cited: Faundes, Anibal and Barzelatto, Jose, "The human drama of abortion: a global search for consensus," Vanderbilt University Press, John Paul II, "Evangelium Vitae: The Gospel of Life," St. Pauls Publications, Mitchell, Alan C. CFACC and AOC are, by their very nature, located several hundred, sometimes thousands of miles from the air battle. And, as emphasized prior, we understand that technology allows command far more specific details than in the history of the military.


That being said, no amount of technology can translate a blip on a screen to an actual threat, and react with the appropriate response within milliseconds. One would think, for instance, that with the thousands upon thousands of dollars the service spends on training their pilots, the number of scenarios engendered, and the amount of air time required to pilot a multimillion dollar piece of extraordinary equipment that command would acknowledge that there needs to be a certain level of trust and allowance for experience and pilot assessment of various high stress situations.


While it is certainly true that, at times, the individual pilot cannot see the "big picture," and…. Death Penalty The debate surrounding capital punishment is not as clear as one might think -- in fact, there is a great deal of gray within this debate. The actual definition is State controlled taking of a human life in response to some crime committed by a person who was legally convicted of that crime Lacayo, Capital punishment has been part of human history, and currently 58 global nations actively practice it, 95 have abolished it, and the remained have not used it in over a decade Amnesty International, Some scholars tout the view that capital punishment produces an extremely strong deterrent effect to crime that actually saves lives, is supported by the majority of Americans, and that each execution actually results in a statistically viable reduction in murders Muhlhausen, As of , however, Amnesty International categorizes most countries as abolitionist regarding the death penalty Figures on….


Virginia Supreme Court U. php "Capital Punishment, 30 Years On: Support, but Ambivalence as Well. Sociology Debate: A central debate in sociology revolves around whether the power elite or pluralist view is correct. Which do you believe and why? Explain your answer. The Power Elite view seeks to look at the way the elites rule and influence the running of the American society as a whole in the day-to-day basis. One scholar in sociology, Smith Mark in his analysis of C. Wrights work, tries to explain the rule of the elite in terms of institution that are formed to ensure the elite has a firm hand on the power controls. He identifies three main institutions that occupy the key positions in the society; major business corporations, the federal government and the military.


He says that those in command of the three institutions do and will always have the same values and interest. They coalesce and interconnect to form a single ruling minority. Among these…. References Don Albrecht et. al Minority Concentration, Disadvantage, and Inequality in the Nonmetropolitan United States. Midwest Sociological Quarterly, Impact Lab The 10 people most responsible for the Recession. Job Losses Continue, ADP Surveys Suggest. It must be considered, as well, that genetic testing is a somewhat newer thing and the results can be skewed; so even if a doctor did do a test and results came up negative, there is a chance something could have been positive.


Is the doctor responsible for the fact that the test didn't find any genetic problems? It would be absolutely nonsensical to think that the doctor should be punished for not detecting problems. It is also incredibly unfair. When two people decide to have children, they are basically assuming all responsibilities and they should be aware that giving birth to a child means knowing that there are certain risks involved. There is this question to be considered: If an aborted child cannot sue for wrongful death, how can anyone sue for wrongful life? What will happen, if we aren't careful, is that doctors will become very wary of…. References: Bayles, Michael D. Harm to the unconceived. Kalamazoo College -- Western Michigan University Conference in Philosophy of Law.


Doerr, Adam. The 'wrongful life' debate. Genonomics Law Report. This issue has not been adequately addressed by health care reform. The underlying trend in each of these major issues in health care reform is controlling the rising cost. Malpractice reform seeks to control the cost of insurance to health care providers, so that they can pass those savings along to consumers. The public option provides a plan for affordable health care coverage for uninsured and underinsured Americans. This is deemed necessary because private insurers will not offer insurance to those it feels will demand too much in terms of health care costs going forward.


Reducing the cost of health…. Works Cited: Carey, Nick. Uninsured Americans hope reform brings health coverage. The Obama Plan: Stability and Security for All Americans. PDF New York Times. Malpractice and Health Care Reform. New York Times. html Kaiser Family Foundation. Prescription Drug Trends. Kaiser Family Foundation. Douglas stated that he would vote for the admission of any state with any form of the Constitution ratified by the territory's people. If the people showed that they wanted slavery, they should have it, he said, if the people prohibited slavery it should be prohibited.


Of course, the entire voting population all the territories were free, white men. Still, Douglas saw this as an effective and moderate compromise and attempted to paint Lincoln as an abolitionist radical. The most contentious specific policy at stake in the second debate was that of Kansas' prospective constitution. The people of the Kansas territory wished their state to be admitted as an enslaved state, and keep what they considered their property, namely their slaves. This was in violation of previous compromises, however, designed to keep the Union in a state of free and enslaved representational balance. Douglas supported the pro-slavery constitution of Kansas,…. These people demonstrated that a trial regarding a possible capital sentence is lengthy and is probable to reflect negatively on the suspect, considering that he or she experiences intense feelings as he or she stands and waits for the jury to decide whether he or she is going to live another day or not.


Taking into account the nature of the crimes attributed to a person who is susceptible to be sentenced to death, it is irrelevant whether or not he or she spends a significant amount of time in courts. Another legal issue that emerges when discussing in regard to capital punishment is related to the influence of constitutional rights in the case of a person who is convicted for serious crimes. Works cited: Adam Bedau, Hugo, and Cassell, Paul G. The Experts on Both Sides Make Their Case," Oxford University Press, Mandery, Evan J. Global Warming The Debate of Global Warming Global Warming is a serious problem for our planet and our generation.


This is a topic of much concern and debate. The climate change in our environment has been the center of many debates. A debate can be described as a discussion in which people or groups state different opinions about a subject. It can also be described as a competition in which teams of people, mostly students, discuss a subject in front of a group of judges and the team that makes the best argument wins. The following is a debate outline:. It includes:. The introduction is made up of:. Second Affirmative Constructive. This part includes:. Negative side:. Affirmative side. Debate Outline: Debate Speech Outline A debate can be described as a discussion in which people or groups state different opinions about a subject.


Debate Outline: Debate Outline For Students In College Or Highschool The following is a debate outline: 1. First Affirmative Constructive. It includes: Introduction. The introduction is made up of: Opening. State also that you are speaking for the affirmative. Express pleasure for the chance to debate the topic. Give your resolution. Define the key terms in your presentation. Present your thesis statement to give your audience a direction. Body Describe the issue that you are presenting.. Support the affirmative case using 4 to 6 arguments. Tips and Warnings.


Related Articles. Article Summary. Co-authored by wikiHow Staff Last Updated: August 12, References. Method 1. Identify the form of debate your outline is for. There are several different types of debate, such as parliamentary debates and Lincoln-Douglas debates, that each have their own organizational structure. The order in which speakers present their arguments differs between each debate form. Thus, you'll have to base your debate outline on the particular structure of the debate you'll be engaging in. In the first half of the debate, each team has two segments to present arguments for their side. In the second half of the debate, each team has two segments to rebut arguments presented in the first half.


Lincoln-Douglas debates are set up to allow one side to present their arguments, and then the other team to cross-examine them. The second team then presents their arguments and has the first team cross-examine them. Finally, each team has an opportunity for a final rebuttal. Research the debate question and decide which side to take. Use quality sources , such as peer-reviewed journals and academic books, to gather the best information possible about your debate topic. Focus on finding relevant facts, statistics, quotations, cases, and examples that are related to the topic at hand.


Then, based on this evidence, decide which side of the debate has the strongest argument and take that side, if possible. If you're writing the debate outline for an assignment and can't pick your own side, focus on gathering as much evidence as possible to strengthen the argument you're tasked with making. Whatever argument you ultimately make, make sure that it is logically sound and that you have convincing, relevant evidence that supports it. Be sure to note all bibliographical information on your notes. For every supporting piece of evidence you find for your case, try to find another piece of evidence to counter it.


This will help you build your argument later. It is better to include more points than you think you will need, than not doing enough research and lacking evidence. Categorize all the evidence you come across in your research. On a piece of paper, list all the different pieces of evidence you've found that supports your case the primary argument you're making. Order it so that the most influential and powerful evidence is the first to be presented, mediocre evidence is in the middle, and a final powerful piece is at the end. Then, make the same kind of list for all the evidence you've found that supports your opponent's argument.


If you have a fairly lengthy debate planned, break up your case evidence into categorical sections. For example, you could have legal, moral, and economic support for your case. Aim to have a minimum of 3 supporting facts or pieces of evidence in your case outline. Method 2. Follow outlining principles that will keep your outline organized. While the order of your material will be determined by your debate form, the format for your debate outline should follow the basic guidelines for outlining. Organize your outline with main headings and subheadings marked by Roman numerals, capital letters, and Arabic numerals. Main headings will probably consist of arguments, while subheadings will contain different pieces of supporting evidence. Use correct symbols. Each level of the outline has a particular symbol to use.


The main headings will use Roman numerals I, II, III, IV. Subheadings use capital letters A, B, C. Sub-sub headings use Arabic numerals 1, 2, 3. Keep these consistent throughout your outline. Indent each level. Indentation helps you follow the line of argument and keeps your outline organized. Start by outlining your introduction. The introduction should include an overview of the research question or topic of debate, as well as a thesis statement for your overall argument. Finally, write another bullet point below this one that states your thesis. Write out your first main point in the form of a thesis statement. This line of argument should be the most convincing piece of evidence for why your overall argument is correct. State the relevant evidence and significance for this main point.


Add additional subheadings below your first line of argument and briefly write out all the relevant pieces of evidence that support this claim. Then, add a final subheading and explain why this sub argument is important to the overall case you're making in the debate. For example, the evidence that electric cars produce less carbon dioxide emissions than gas cars might include statistical information compiled by the Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. Repeat this process for each additional part of your argument. Create a subheading for each line of argument you'll make to advance your overall argument. Then, write out the evidence and significance for each of these sub-arguments as well.


Prepare rebuttals to address potential counterarguments.

No comments:

Post a Comment